4.6 Article

Signatures of Microevolutionary Processes in Phylogenetic Patterns

期刊

SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 131-144

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syy049

关键词

Diversification rates; evolutionary radiation; individual-based model; parapatry; speciation; sympatry

资金

  1. Capes [302049/2015-0, 2016/06054-3, 2016/01343-7]
  2. FAPESP [2015/11985-3, 2014/10470-7, 2015/26989-4]
  3. CNPq [152885/2016-1]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [16/01343-7, 16/06054-3] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phylogenetic trees are representations of evolutionary relationships among species and contain signatures of the processes responsible for the speciation events they display. Inferring processes from tree properties, however, is challenging. To address this problem, we analyzed a spatially-explicit model of speciation where genome size and mating range can be controlled. We simulated parapatric and sympatric (narrow and wide mating range, respectively) radiations and constructed their phylogenetic trees, computing structural properties such as tree balance and speed of diversification. We showed that parapatric and sympatric speciation are well separated by these structural tree properties. Balanced trees with constant rates of diversification only originate in sympatry and genome size affected both the balance and the speed of diversification of the simulated trees. Comparison with empirical data showed that most of the evolutionary radiations considered to have developed in parapatry or sympatry are in good agreement with model predictions. Even though additional forces other than spatial restriction of gene flow, genome size, and genetic incompatibilities, do play a role in the evolution of species formation, the microevolutionary processes modeled here capture signatures of the diversification pattern of evolutionary radiations, regarding the symmetry and speed of diversification of lineages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据