4.5 Article

Temperature modulates Fischerella thermalis ecotypes in Porcelana Hot Spring

期刊

SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 531-543

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2018.05.006

关键词

Hot spring; Fischerella; Ecotypes; MALDI-TOF MS; Metagenomic assembled genomes; ANI

资金

  1. FONDECYT [1110696, 1150171]
  2. FONDAP [15110009]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy [CLG2015 66686-C3-1-P, BES-2013-064420]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the Porcelana Hot Spring (Northern Patagonia), true-branching cyanobacteria are the dominant primary producers in microbial mats, and they are mainly responsible for carbon and nitrogen fixation. However, little is known about their metabolic and genomic adaptations at high temperatures. Therefore, in this study, a total of 81 Fischerella thermalis strains (also known as Mastigocladus laminosus) were isolated from mat samples in a thermal gradient between 61-46 degrees C. The complementary use of proteomic comparisons from these strains, and comparative genomics of F. thermalis pangenomes, suggested that at least two different ecotypes were present within these populations. MALDI-TOF MS analysis separated the strains into three clusters; two with strains obtained from mats within the upper temperature range (61 and 54 degrees C), and a third obtained from mats within the lower temperature range (51 and 46 degrees C). Both groups possessed different but synonymous nifH alleles. The main proteomic differences were associated with the abundance of photosynthesis-related proteins. Three F. thermalis metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs) were described from 66, 58 and 48 degrees C metagenomes. These pangenomes indicated a divergence of orthologous genes and a high abundance of exclusive genes at 66 degrees C. These results improved the current understanding of thermal adaptation of F. thermalis and the evolution of these thermophilic cyanobacterial species. (C) 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据