4.5 Article

Agrobacterium bohemicum sp nov isolated from poppy seed wastes in central Bohemia

期刊

SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 184-190

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2018.01.003

关键词

Agrobacterium; Taxonomy; ANI; MLSA; Codeine; Papaver somniferum

资金

  1. Grant Agency of Charles University [720414]
  2. Institute of Microbiology CAS, v. v. i. project [RVO 61388971]
  3. Institute of Biotechnology CAS, v. v. i. project [86 652 036]
  4. ERDF [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/19.0390]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two non-pathogenic strains R89-1 and R90(T) isolated from poppy seed (Papaver somniferum L.) wastes were phenotypically and genotypically characterized. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) was conducted with six genes (atpD, ginA, gyrB, recA, rpoB, 16S rRNA). The strains represented a new species which clustered with Agrobacterium rubi NBRC 13261(T) and Agrobacterium skierniewicense Ch1 1(T) type strains. MLSA was further accompanied by whole-genome phylogeny, in silico DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) and average nucleotide identity (ANI) analyses for both strains. ANI and dDDH values were deep below the species delineation threshold. Phenotypic features of the novel strains unequivocally allowed their differentiation from all other Agrobacterium species. Unlike other agrobacteria, the strains were salt sensitive and were able to biotransform morphine alkaloids. The dominant cellular fatty acids are 18:1 w7c, 16:0 and 12:0 aldehyde/16:1 iso I/14:0 30H summed in feature 2 and the major respiratory quinine is Q-10 (87%). The DNA G + C content is 56 mol%. Microbial community analysis indicated probable association with P. somniferum plant material. Altogether, these characteristics showed that strains R90(T) and R89-1 represent a new species of the genus Agrobacterium which we propose to name Agrobacterium bohemicum. The type strain of A. bohemicum is R90(T) (=CCM 8736(T) = DSM 104667(T)). (C) 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据