4.7 Article

Electrochemical noise analysis to examine the corrosion behavior of Ni-P deposit on AM60B alloy plated by Zr pretreatment

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 346, 期 -, 页码 29-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.04.032

关键词

Magnesium alloy; Electroless plating; SEM; AFM; Electrochemical noise; Localization index

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electroless Ni-P coating was applied on AM60B magnesium alloy using eco-friendly zirconium pretreatment. Firstly, the alloy surface was entirely covered by a network-like cracked Zr conversion film after appropriate pretreatment time which was determined by Continuous Noise Resistance Calculation (CNRC). Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) was used to elemental analysis of the conversion coating. Next, the pre-treated surface was plated by dense, pore-free, and uniform electroless Ni-P coating with fine cauliflower-like nodules. Elemental analysis revealed that Ni-P coating has moderate amount of phosphorus corresponding to a mixed crystalline-amorphous structure which was confirmed by X-ray Diffraction (XRD). CNRC technique was also used to analyze corrosion protection capacity of the electroless layer in acidified 3.5 wt% NaCl solution. Variation of noise resistance versus time for the bare and Ni-P coating revealed that the corrosion resistance remarkably improved by the electroless plating. The noise resistance was initially decreased because of slow diffusion of the corrosive species into intergranular spaces and then increased due to the filling of the solution pathways by corrosion products. Finally, the noise resistance continuously decreased as a result of corrosion products dissolution. There was no numerical agreement between the results of EIS and CNRC techniques due to localization of the corrosion which was confirmed by SEM. Also, Continuous Localization Index (CLI) was utilized to show the localization of the corrosion in Ni-P/Mg system. Microhardness and adhesion of the obtained coating were also evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据