4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Wide-range infrared transparency of hydrated magnesium-carbon films with high mobility for enhanced conductivity

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 365, 期 -, 页码 70-75

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.04.048

关键词

Electrical properties; Infrared transparent conductive films; Magnetron sputtering; Hydrated magnesium-carbon films; Semiconductors

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51625201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51372053]
  3. National Key Laboratory Funds [914C490106150C49001]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. NSRIF [2017002]
  6. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFR50300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hydrated magnesium-carbon films fabricated in this study demonstrated that grain growth and crystallinity modification by substrate temperature treatment crystallization produce films with fewer internal imperfections. This results in high mobility of the solution-deposited hydrated magnesium-carbon electrical conductance, with a corresponding dramatic harmonious transmittance in the infrared range. An investigation of the hydrated magnesium-carbon films shows that the temperature treatment dramatically improves the electron mobility and decreases the carrier concentration, which in turn simultaneously increases the conductivity and transparency. The hydrated magnesium-carbon films exhibit a mobility of up to 85.2 cm(2)/(V.s) and the resistivity declines rapidly to 1.72 x 10(-2) Omega cm. The transmittance of the visible spectrum increased to 90%. Although the conductivity of hydrated magnesium-carbon films is not prominent comparing to the conventional and widely-used n-type TCO materials, e.g. ITO, the films also showed excellent optical properties, which can be attributed to their low bond energy, with the infrared transmittance of the films being greater than 70% for a plasma wavelength of approximately 10 mu m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据