4.5 Article

CRISPR/Cas9-Targeted Deletion of Polyglutamine in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3-Derived iPSCs

期刊

STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 27, 期 11, 页码 756-770

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2017.0209

关键词

CRISPR/Cas9; polyglutamine; SCA3; gene editing; induced pluripotent cells

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province [2016B030229008]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2014A030312012]
  3. International Cooperation Project of Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2013B51000087]
  4. Science and Information Technology of Guangzhou Key Project [2015080 20258, 201400000003-4, 201400000004-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is caused by an abnormal expansion of the cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) triplet in ATXN3, which translates into a polyglutamine (polyQ) tract within ataxin-3 (ATXN3) protein. Although the pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear, it is well established that expression of mutant forms of ATXN3 carrying an expanded polyQ domain are involved in SCA3 pathogenesis, and several strategies to suppress mutant ATXN3 have shown promising potential for SCA3 treatment. In this study, we described successful clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9-mediated deletion of the expanded polyQ-encoding region of ATXN3 in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from a SCA3 patient, and these patient-specific iPSCs retained pluripotency and neural differentiation following expanded polyQ deletion. Furthermore, the ubiquitin-binding capacity of ATXN3 was retained in the neural cells differentiated from the corrected iPSCs. For the first time, this work provides preliminary data for gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in SCA3, and demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-guide RNA pair to delete the expanded polyQ-encoding region of ATXN3, suggesting the potential efficacy of this method for future therapeutic application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据