4.7 Article

Detection of olive oil adulteration with waste cooking oil via Raman spectroscopy combined with iPLS and SiPLS

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2017.06.049

关键词

Raman spectrum; Synergy interval partial least square; Olive oil; Waste cooking oil; Adulteration

资金

  1. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20124401120005]
  2. Key Technologies R & D Program of Guangdong Province, China [2012A032300016]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [S2011040001850]
  4. Guangdong College of Outstanding Youth Innovation Talent Training Project in China [LYM11026]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [21612436, 21612353]
  6. project of Academician Workstation of Guangdong Province, China [2014B090905001]
  7. Key Project of Scientific and Technological Projects of Guang Zhou, China [201604040007, 201604020168]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Olive oil adulteration with waste cooking oil was detected and quantified by combining optical Raman scattering spectroscopy and chemometrics. Spectra of 96 olive oil samples with waste cooking oil (2.5%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 30% and 50%) were collected by the portable Raman spectroscopy system. iPLS and SiPLS quantitative analysis models were established. The results revealed that spectral data after SNV processing are the best for synergy interval partial least square (SiPLS) modeling and forecast. The root mean squared error of calibration (RMSEC) is 0.0503 and the root mean squared error of validation (RMSEV) is 0.0485. The lower limit of application (LLA) of the proposed method is c[WCO] = 0.5%. According to linear regression calculation, the theoretical limit of detection (LOD) of the proposed method is about c[WCO] = 0.475%. The established model could make effective quantitative analysis on adulteration of waste cooking oil. It provides a quick accurate method for adulteration detection of waste cooking oil in olive oil. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据