4.4 Article

Regional 3-D Modeling of Ground Electromagnetic Field Due To Realistic Geomagnetic Disturbances

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017SW001793

关键词

EM modeling; 3-D conductivity models; MHD modeling

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [200021-159970]
  2. Swiss National Supercomputing Center (CSCS) [s767]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_159970] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During extreme space weather events the fluctuating geomagnetic field induces an electric field in the conducting Earth. This geoelectric field in turn generates currents in ground-based technological systems, affecting their operation. Thus, calculation of the geoelectric field is a key step in predicting, assessing, and, potentially, forecasting the space weather impact on critical infrastructure. We present an approach and a tool for the first fully coupled regional three-dimensional (3-D) forward modeling of the electromagnetic field from far geospace down to the surface of the Earth. Applying the developed tool to the British Isles, we perform a 3-D study in order to explore in detail the so-called coastal effect (i.e., the anomalous behavior of the geoelectric field near the coasts) and to understand the limitations of the thin-sheet model widely used for estimating this effect. For this purpose we compare the results of 3-D and thin-sheet modelings for plane wave source of excitation and different periods of variations. We conclude that for the British Isles the thin sheet is a reasonable approximation for periods longer than a few minutes. However, for shorter periods 3-D modeling is essential. Another inference from the results of 3-D modeling for plane wave and realistic sources is that for the British Isles the geoelectric field is distorted by the coastal effect practically everywhere on land. Finally, we compare modeled and observed geomagnetic fields at four observatories in the region during the first day of the Halloween storm in 2003 and discuss the results of this comparison.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据