4.5 Article

Comparative studies of live tapetum cells in sterile garlic (Allium sativum) and fertile leek (Allium ampeloprasum) using the fluorescence lifetime imaging analytical method

期刊

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 222-231

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.05.021

关键词

Album sativum; Album ampefoprasurn; Male sterility; Tapetum, fluorescence lifetime

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund under the Operational Program Innovative Economy, project: National Multidisciplinary Laboratory of Functional Nanomaterials - NanoFur [POIG.02.02.00-00-025/09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercially cultivated Allium sativum has lost the ability to reproduce sexually due to various developmental abnormalities mainly in the male line associated with a phenomenon called male sterility. Numerous studies focused on discovering the cause of garlic male sterility at the tissue and cellular level have not yet fully resolved this issue. Here, we have focused our attention on the tapetum, i.e. a nutritive tissue regarded in plants as a critical factor for formation of viable pollen. We have applied a novel method, Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging (HIM), which represents one of the most sensitive biophysical tools for assessment of changes in fluorophorc lifetime, depending on its metabolic state in a live cell Contrary to traditional methods based on cell fixation, RIM analysis provides live tapetal cell imaging, which facilitates monitoring metabolic changes in the cell We have shown qualitative metabolic discrepancies in live cells of the tapetum in sterile garlic and fertile leek and proposed a correlative metabolic model of miffospore and tapetum development in garlic cultivars, indicating that the disturbances in the temporal coordination of programmed cell death within the anther might be regarded as the main cause of male sterility in the analysed A. sativum cultivars. (C) 2018 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All tights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据