4.7 Article

Effects of artificial warming on different soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools in a subtropical plantation

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 161-167

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.06.007

关键词

Acid resistant C; Acid resistant N; Extracellular enzyme activity; Extractable C and N; Microbial community composition; Subtropical plantation

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB954003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1405231, 31130013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uncertainty about the effects of climate warming on belowground processes of tropical and subtropical forests limits our ability to predict the response and feedback of such ecosystems to future climate change. Few field experiments in the tropics and subtropics have been conducted on the effects of manipulating warming on microbial community, enzyme activities and soil organic carbon (C) decomposition of forest ecosystems. Here, using buried cable techniques, we conducted a microcosm warming experiment to investigate extractable and acid resistant C and nitrogen (N) pools, microbial community composition, and enzyme activity after about 1.5 years of soil warming (+ 5 degrees C) in a subtropical plantation in southeastern China. The microbial community structure was quantified with phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis. Soil extractable and acid resistant C and N fractions were determined using a two-step sulfuric acid hydrolysis. We found that warming increased soil extractable C by 28% and acid resistant N decomposition by 20%. Soil warming decreased soil microbial N use efficiency by 31% but did not alter microbial C use efficiency. Warming differentially affected bacteria, fungi and enzymes activities. Our results suggest that climate warming can alter microbial community structure and enzyme activity and consequently lead to a serious imbalance between soil N and C decomposition in subtropical tree plantations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据