4.7 Article

A Fuzzy Logic Based Approach to Assess Sustainable Development of the Mining and Minerals Sector

期刊

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 386-399

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sd.503

关键词

sustainable development; economics of sustainable development; weak sustainability criteria; sustainability indicators; assessment for sustainability; mining and minerals sector; fuzzy logic; degree of sustainability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assessing sustainable development, especially of the mining and minerals sector, is a challenge. This paper is an attempt to address this challenge by developing a methodology using fuzzy logic that encompasses the definitions, fundamentals, economic underpinnings and criteria of sustainable development. The paper starts by distinguishing the newly conceptualized assessment for sustainability from the generally practiced sustainability assessment, framework, clarifying that the former looks at the process in question and lays out the path to be followed to assess sustainability, while the latter is just a static report. It then highlights the inherent limitations of the three traditional sustainability assessment tools and attempts to improve upon these limitations by proposing a model using fuzzy logic, weak sustainability criteria and context-dependent sustainability indicators to assess sustainable development of the mining and minerals sector. As an illustration, the paper demonstrates how the proposed methodology can be applied to a reference town, where mining is the primary economic activity. The results derived can be used internally for identification of hot spots as well as externally for sustainability reporting and stakeholder engagement. Assessment for sustainability also facilitates monitoring, estimating the degree of sustainability and defines a course of action for stakeholders as well as policy-makers to improve a project's degree of sustainability. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据