4.0 Article

Community Health Workers Support Community-based Participatory Research Ethics: Lessons Learned along the Research-to-Practice-to-Community Continuum

出版社

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0156

关键词

Colorectal cancer; African Americans; cancer disparities; community-based participatory research; ethics; translational research; community health workers

资金

  1. NCCDPHP
  2. ALLCDC [5U48DP001907-02, 562001] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  3. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000454] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NCI NIH HHS [1R01CA166785-01, U54 CA118638, U54CA118638, U01 CA114652, U54 CA118623, U54 CA118948, U01CA114652, R01 CA166785] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR025008, 5UL1RR025008] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMHD NIH HHS [U54 MD007588, G12 MD007585] Funding Source: Medline
  7. NCCDPHP CDC HHS [DP000049-01, U48 DP000049, U48DP001907, U48 DP001907, 5U48DP000049, U48 DP000049-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethical principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR)-specifically, community engagement, mutual learning, action-reflection, and commitment to sustainability-stem from the work of Kurt Lewin and Paulo Freire. These are particularly relevant in cancer disparities research because vulnerable populations are often construed to be powerless, supposedly benefiting from programs over which they have no control. The long history of exploiting minority individuals and communities for research purposes (the U.S. Public Health Service Tuskegee Syphilis Study being the most notorious) has left a legacy of mistrust of research and researchers. The purpose of this article is to examine experiences and lessons learned from community health workers (CHWs) in the 10-year translation of an educational intervention in the research-to-practice-to-community continuum. We conclude that the central role played by CHWs enabled the community to gain some degree of control over the intervention and its delivery, thus operationalizing the ethical principles of CBPR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据