4.6 Article

Natural selection methods for artificial bee colony with new versions of onlooker bee

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 23, 期 15, 页码 6455-6494

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-018-3299-2

关键词

Artificial bee colony; Swarm intelligence; Selection scheme; Global optimization; Economic load dispatch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm is one of the most recent swarm intelligence-based algorithms simulate the foraging behavior of honey bees in their hive. ABC starts with a colony of artificial bees with sole aim of discovering the place of food sources with high nectar amount using the solution search equation in the employed bee and onlooker bee operators. However, the solution search equation is good in exploration and poor in exploitation. In this paper, the solution search equation of the onlooker bee is modified by using a value of the fittest food sources selected by a set of selection schemes inspired from the evolutionary algorithms. This is to guide the search process of onlooker bee toward the fittest food sources from the population in order to empower the exploitation capability and convergence. Four selection schemes are incorporated with the ABC algorithm to choose the fittest food sources in four versions as follows: global-best, tournament, linear rank, and exponential rank. For evaluation purposes, 10 classical benchmark optimization functions are used to study the sensitivity analysis of each ABC algorithm to its parameters. The performance of the proposed ABC versions is compared with the original ABC version in order to study the effectiveness of the modifications. In addition, a comparative evaluation of ABC algorithms is carried out against the state-of-the-art methods that worked on CEC2005 benchmark functions, CEC2015 benchmark functions, and two real-world cases of economic load dispatch problem. The experimental results show that the selection schemes incorporated within the search equation of the onlooker bee directly affects the performance of ABC algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据