4.5 Article

Putting our heads together: interpersonal neural synchronization as a biological mechanism for shared intentionality

期刊

SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 841-849

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsy060

关键词

functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS); interagency; intention; pre-frontal cortex; hyperscanning

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K01 MH094467, R21 MH100189, R01 MH107540]
  2. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD Young Investigator Award)
  3. NASA Pennsylvania Space Grant Consortium Research Scholarship
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R21MH100189, R01MH107540, K01MH094467] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shared intentionality, or collaborative interactions in which individuals have a shared goal and must coordinate their efforts, is a core component of human interaction. However, the biological bases of shared intentionality and, specifically, the processes by which the brain adjusts to the sharing of common goals, remain largely unknown. Using functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), coordination of cerebral hemodynamic activation was found in subject pairs when completing a puzzle together in contrast to a condition in which subjects completed identical but individual puzzles (same intention without shared intentionality). Interpersonal neural coordination was also greater when completing a puzzle together compared to two control conditions including the observation of another pair completing the same puzzle task or watching a movie with a partner (shared experience). Further, permutation testing revealed that the time course of neural activation of one subject predicted that of their partner, but not that of others completing the identical puzzle in different partner sets. Results indicate unique brain-to-brain coupling specific to shared intentionality beyond what has been previously found by investigating the fundamentals of social exchange.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据