4.8 Review

Silicon-Based Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: From Fundamentals to Practical Applications

期刊

SMALL
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201702737

关键词

binders; electrode engineering; electrolytes; lithium-ion batteries; silicon anodes

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. General Motors Global Research and Development Center
  3. Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy under Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) [DE-AC02-05CH11231, 7056410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicon has been intensively studied as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIB) because of its exceptionally high specific capacity. However, silicon-based anode materials usually suffer from large volume change during the charge and discharge process, leading to subsequent pulverization of silicon, loss of electric contact, and continuous side reactions. These transformations cause poor cycle life and hinder the wide commercialization of silicon for LIBs. The lithiation and delithiation behaviors, and the interphase reaction mechanisms, are progressively studied and understood. Various nanostructured silicon anodes are reported to exhibit both superior specific capacity and cycle life compared to commercial carbon-based anodes. However, some practical issues with nanostructured silicon cannot be ignored, and must be addressed if it is to be widely used in commercial LIBs. This Review outlines major impactful work on silicon-based anodes, and the most recent research directions in this field, specifically, the engineering of silicon architectures, the construction of silicon-based composites, and other performance-enhancement studies including electrolytes and binders. The burgeoning research efforts in the development of practical silicon electrodes, and full-cell silicon-based LIBs are specially stressed, which are key to the successful commercialization of silicon anodes, and large-scale deployment of next-generation high energy density LIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据