4.8 Article

Clay Nanoparticles Elicit Long-Term Immune Responses by Forming Biodegradable Depots for Sustained Antigen Stimulation

期刊

SMALL
卷 14, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201704465

关键词

clay nanoparticles; hectorite; immune cells recruitment; layered double hydroxide; sustained immune stimulation

资金

  1. Australian National Fabrication Facility (Qld Node)
  2. AIBN Group Leader Ph.D.
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project [DP170104643]
  4. University of Queensland
  5. Living Allowance Scholarship
  6. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP170104643]
  7. AIBN Group Leader Ph.D. Living Allowance Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanomaterials have been widely tested as new generation vaccine adjuvants, but few evoke efficient immunoreactions. Clay nanoparticles, for example, layered double hydroxide (LDH) and hectorite (HEC) nanoparticles, have shown their potent adjuvanticity in generating effective and durable immune responses. However, the mechanism by which clay nanoadjuvants stimulate the immune system is not well understood. Here, it is demonstrated that LDH and HEC-antigen complexes form loose agglomerates in culture medium/serum. They also form nodules with loose structures in tissue after subcutaneous injection, where they act as a depot for up to 35 d. More importantly, clay nanoparticles actively and continuously recruit immune cells into the depot for up to one month, and stimulate stronger immune responses than FDA-approved adjuvants, Alum and QuilA. Sustained antigen release is also observed in clay nanoparticle depots, with 50-60% antigen released after 35 d. In contrast, Alum-antigen complexes show minimal antigen release from the depot. Importantly, LDH and HEC are more effective than QuilA and Alum in promoting memory T-cell proliferation. These findings suggest that both clay nanoadjuvants can serve as active vaccine platforms for sustained and potent immune responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据