4.8 Article

Surface Oxidation of AuNi Heterodimers to Achieve High Activities toward Hydrogen/Oxygen Evolution and Oxygen Reduction Reactions

期刊

SMALL
卷 14, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201703749

关键词

Au-Ni nanostructures; hydrogen evolution reaction; oxygen evolution reaction; oxygen reduction reaction; trifunctional electrocatalysts

资金

  1. NSFC [21521091, 21431003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21431003, 21541004]
  3. Explorer 100 cluster system of the Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology
  4. China Ministry of Science and Technology [2016YFA0202801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although much attention has been paid to the exploration of highly active electrocatalysts, especially catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), the development of multifunctional catalysts remains a challenge. Here, we utilize AuNi heterodimers as the starting materials to achieve high activities toward HER, OER and ORR. The HER and ORR activities in an alkali environment are similar to those of Pt catalysts, and the OER activity is very high and better than that of commercial IrO2. Both the experimental and calculated results suggest that the surface oxidation under oxidative conditions is the main reason for the different activities. The NiO/Ni interface which exists in the as-synthesized heterodimers contributes to high HER activity, the Ni(OH)(2)-Ni-Au interface and the surface Ni(OH)(2) obtained in electrochemical conditons gives rise to promising ORR and OER activities, respectively. As a comparison, a Au@Ni core-shell structure is also synthesized and examined. The core-shell structure shows lower activities for HER and OER than the heterodimers, and reduces O-2 selectively to H2O2. The work here allows for the development of a method to design multifunctional catalysts via the partial oxidation of a metal surface to create different active centers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据