4.8 Article

Photothermal Therapy Generates a Thermal Window of Immunogenic Cell Death in Neuroblastoma

期刊

SMALL
卷 14, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201800678

关键词

immunogenic cell death; neuroblastoma; photothermal therapy; Prussian blue nanoparticles; thermal dose

资金

  1. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer
  2. George Washington University Cancer Center
  3. Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation at Children's National Health System

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A thermal window of immunogenic cell death (ICD) elicited by nanoparticle-based photothermal therapy (PTT) in an animal model of neuroblastoma is described. In studies using Prussian blue nanoparticles to administer photothermal therapy (PBNP-PTT) to established localized tumors in the neuroblastoma model, it is observed that PBNP-PTT conforms to the more is better paradigm, wherein higher doses of PBNP-PTT generates higher cell/local heating and thereby more cell death, and consequently improved animal survival. However, in vitro analysis of the biochemical correlates of ICD (ATP, high-motility group box 1, and calreticulin) elicited by PBNP-PTT demonstrates that PBNP-PTT triggers a thermal window of ICD. ICD markers are highly expressed within an optimal temperature (thermal dose) window of PBNP-PTT (63.3-66.4 degrees C) as compared with higher (83.0-83.5 degrees C) and lower PBNP-PTT (50.7-52.7 degrees C) temperatures, which both yield lower expression. Subsequent vaccination studies in the neuroblastoma model confirm the in vitro findings, wherein PBNP-PTT administered within the optimal temperature window results in long-term survival (33.3% at 100 d) compared with PBNP-PTT administered within the higher (0%) and lower (20%) temperature ranges, and controls (0%). The findings demonstrate a tunable immune response to heat generated by PBNP-PTT, which should be critically engaged in the administration of PTT for maximizing its therapeutic benefits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据