4.6 Article

Melanin-concentrating hormone-expressing neurons adjust slow-wave sleep dynamics to catalyze paradoxical (REM) sleep

期刊

SLEEP
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsy068

关键词

melanin-concentrating hormone; tuberal hypothalamus; DREADD; pharmacogenetics; CNO; REM sleep; slow-wave sleep

资金

  1. CNRS [UMR5292]
  2. INSERM [U1028]
  3. Universite Claude Bernard Lyon I
  4. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation (MESRI)
  5. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR, OPTOREM project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: Experimental studies over the last 15 years established a role in sleep of the tuberal hypothalamic neurons that express melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH). Controversies still remain regarding their actual contribution to both slow-wave sleep (SWS) and paradoxical sleep (PS also known as REM sleep) or PS alone. Methods: To address this point, we compared effects of chemogenetic activation and inhibition of MCH neurons on SWS and PS amounts and EEG rhythmic activities in transgenic Pmch-cre mice. Results: In agreement with recently reported optogenetic data, the activation of MCH neurons invariably facilitates PS onset and maintenance. Our chemogenetic experiments further disclose that the ultradian rhythm of SWS is also notably related to the activity of MCH neurons. We observed that the mean duration of SWS episodes is significantly extended when MCH neurons are inhibited. Conversely, when they were excited, SWS bouts were drastically shortened and depicted substantial changes in delta rhythmic activities in electroencephalographic recording likely reflecting a deeper SWS. Conclusions: According to these original findings, we propose that when MCH neurons are physiologically recruited, SWS depth is increased and the extinction of SWS episodes is accelerated, two joint physiological processes strengthening the probability for natural SWS to PS transition and likely facilitating PS onset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据