4.6 Article

ON DETERMINISTIC REFORMULATIONS OF DISTRIBUTIONALLY ROBUST JOINT CHANCE CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS

期刊

SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 1151-1182

出版社

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/16M1094725

关键词

distributionally robust; chance constraint; (bi)convex program; mixed integer program

资金

  1. Georgia Tech Algorithms and Randomness Center (ARC)
  2. National Science Foundation [1633196]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1633196] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A joint chance constrained optimization problem involves multiple uncertain constraints, i.e., constraints with stochastic parameters, that are jointly required to be satisfied with probability exceeding a prespecified threshold. In a distributionally robust joint chance constrained optimization problem (DRCCP), the joint chance constraint is required to hold for all probability distributions of the stochastic parameters from a given ambiguity set. In this work, we consider DRCCPs involving convex nonlinear uncertain constraints and an ambiguity set specified by convex moment constraints. We investigate deterministic reformulations of such problems and conditions under which such deterministic reformulations are convex. In particular we show that a DRCCP can be reformulated as a convex program if one the following conditions hold: (i) there is a single uncertain constraint, (ii) the ambiguity set is defined by a single moment constraint, (iii) the ambiguity set is defined by linear moment constraints, and (iv) the uncertain and moment constraints are positively homogeneous with respect to uncertain parameters. We further show that if the decision variables are binary and the uncertain constraints are linear then a DRCCP can be reformulated as a deterministic mixed integer convex program. Finally, we present a numerical study to illustrate that the proposed mixed integer convex reformulation can be solved efficiently by existing solvers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据