4.7 Article

Direct contact membrane distillation module scale-up calculations: Choosing between convective and conjugate approaches

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 279-292

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.052

关键词

DCMD; CFD; Conjugate approach; Convective approach; Large scale module

资金

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia
  2. National Institute of Marine Science and Coastal Management, Algeria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane distillation (MD) process technology is swiftly moving to industrial prototyping where efficient scale-up calculations are crucial to shorten product development cycle. The aim of this numerical investigation is to suggest the best modeling strategy that will enable to innovate; modify or check new direct contact MD (DCMD) module designs or operation in a timely manner. Two main modeling strategies are presented, namely convective and conjugate approaches. For a given flat module, it is shown that replacing the permeate side by a modified convection boundary condition that accounts for every known resistance to heat transfer gives similar results in the feed side as a coupled conjugate approach where the membrane, with a modified thermal conductivity, is part of the computational domain. The two methods are compared for different module lengths in terms of permeate flux and temperature distribution. Simulation time reports show the important gain in CPU time when using the convective approach while retaining desired calculation accuracy during scale-up. Furthermore, investigations were carried out to assess the effect of 3D inlet and outlet effects. Results for a laboratory scale module suggest that the convective approach can be safely used during early design stages and scale-up of single modules in the range of high permeate fluxes, while the conjugate approach has to be used for an accurate prediction of permeate temperatures needed in heat recovery strategy and equipment design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据