4.7 Article

Construction of Bi2O3/g-C3N4 composite photocatalyst and its enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance and mechanism

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 301-309

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.04.061

关键词

Bi2O3/g-C3N4; Z-scheme photocatalyst; Visible light; Photocatalysis; Amido black 10B dye

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51508254]
  2. Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Cleaning Materials [KFK1502]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. Key Laboratory of Comprehensive and Highly Efficient Utilization of Salt Lake Resources, Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes, Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve the photocatalytic (PC) performance of g-C3N4 nano-material, a novel Z-scheme Bi2O3/g-C3N4 composite photocatalyst was synthesized by heat treatment method. Subsequently, the morphologies, chemical structures, optical and photoelectrochemical (PECH) properties of as-obtained photocatalysts were investigated through X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas, UV visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV vis DRS), transient photocurrent density, Mott-Schottky (M-S) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement. Furthermore, the PC efficiency was evaluated by degradation of amido black 10B dye. All results indicated that as-fabricated Bi2O3/g-C3N4 photocatalytic system displayed superior PC performance under visible light illumination, which was mainly ascribed to the intense visible light absorbance and the migration of photo-generated carriers adopted a Z-scheme mechanism. Moreover, the degradation of amido black 10B for 3 wt.%Bi2O3/g-C3N4 were about 1.41 and 1.42 times than that of pure g-C3N4 and pure Bi2O3, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据