4.7 Article

Enrichment of hydrazine from aqueous solutions by vacuum membrane distillation through microporous polystyrene membranes of enhanced hydrophobicity

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 159-167

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.04.035

关键词

Membrane distillation; Polystyrene membrane; Hydrazine hydrate; Flux; CFD

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrazine hydrate (HH) is synthesized by different chemical routes, which yield dilute aqueous solutions that need to be concentrated for further use. Separation of hydrazine is essential for its application as a rocket fuel. Conventional routes such as distillation prove to be hazardous due to the highly inflammable and explosive nature of hydrazine. Membrane distillation (MD) is an alternative but the highly safe process for dehydration of hydrazine since water can be vapourized thermally through a porous hydrophobic membrane. In this regard, proper selection of polymer is an important factor due to high alkalinity of hydrazine. A new solvent resistant, hydrophobic and mechanically robust microporous polystyrene (PS) membrane was prepared on a macroporous polyester fabric support using phase inversion technique and crosslinked with tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) for MD based dehydration of HH. SEM and FTIR studies were performed to study membrane morphology and intermolecular interactions. Microporous polystyrene membranes were successful in separating feed mixture containing 50 wt% hydrazine by exhibiting a reasonable water flux of 5.03 kg/m(2) h, with water concentration in permeate being 97.18% at 75 mm Hg downstream vacuum. A two-dimensional model based on finite element method (FEM) was developed to predict the concentration profile within the membrane using computational fluid dynamics. This study proves that commercial grade hydrazine could be safely recovered from its aqueous reaction liquor by MD technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据