4.7 Article

Decoupling the effect of membrane thickness and CNC concentration in PVA based nanocomposite membranes for CO2/CH4 separation

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 220-225

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.04.076

关键词

Crystalline nanocellulose (CNC); Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA); Nanocomposite membranes; Facilitated transport membranes (FTM); Biogas upgrading

资金

  1. National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST) Islamabad, Pakistan
  2. Norwegian Research Council project: NanoMBE of the Nano2021 program [239172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of the viscosity of the casting suspension on membrane morphology and thickness has been investigated for polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/crystalline nanocellulose (CNC) nanocomposite membranes used for CO2/CH4 separation. Different concentrations of CNC suspended in dissolved PVA affected the viscosities of resulting suspensions. A methodology was developed to make equal viscosity suspensions with variable CNC content. SEM micrographs show that by increasing the concentration of CNC in PVA, the thickness of the selective layer increased. However, equal thickness was achieved by water dilution for viscosity adjustment. The overall objective of this work was to find the real optimum concentration of CNC in PVA for CO2/CH4 separation independent of the membrane thickness. Furthermore, the effect of the relative humidity (RH) and feed pressure on the selectivity and permeability of the membranes were also investigated as part of this study. For 1.5% CNC in PVA with pH 9 in the casting suspension, tested at feed pressure of 5 bar, CO2/CH4 selectivity was up to 39 and the achieved permeance was 0.27 m(3) (STP)/(m(2)h bar). Above this concentration of CNC, the CO2 permeation and selectivity decreased. It was also observed that increasing pressure caused a decrease in the performance of the membranes for CO2 capture in terms of both permeation and selectivity. Moreover, increasing RH causes increasing in CO2 permeation and selectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据