4.7 Article

Non-thermal plasma and Fe2+ activated persulfate ignited degradation of aqueous crystal violet: Degradation mechanism and artificial neural network modeling

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 75-85

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.016

关键词

Non-thermal plasma; Persulfate; Crystal violet; Degradation mechanism; Artificial neural network

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21375148, 51208163]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JZ2016HGPA0733]
  3. Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University [2013491211]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Degradation of aqueous crystal violet (CV) by non-thermal plasma combined with Fe2+ activated persulfate (PS) was investigated. Compared with single Fe2+ activated PS system and single non-thermal plasma system, 54% and 42% enhancement for the degradation rates of CV were observed in the non-thermal plasma combined with Fe2+ activated PS (NTP/Fe2+/PS) system, respectively. The effects of initial pH, discharge power, Fe2+ concentration and PS addition on the degradation of CV were reported. The degradation of CV by NTP/Fe2+/PS followed pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics. The concentrations of generated H2O2, O-3 and OH in the NTP/Fe2+/PS system achieved 0.36 mg/L, 1.36 mg/L and 3.2 x 10(-6) mol/L at 1 min, respectively. In the NTP/Fe2+/PS system, the absorbance of the aqueous solution at 584 nm, the pH value and TOC decreased with increasing reaction time. Intermediate products and the degradation mechanism of CV were proposed according to the analysis of gas chromatography mass spectrometry. The acute toxicity of the solution showed a decreasing trend with the reaction time. The artificial neural network (ANN) models of NTP/Fe2+/PS system were established, and the ANN model could simulate the CV degradation process effectively. In the NTP/Fe2+/PS system, pH value had the greatest effect on the degradation of CV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据