4.7 Article

Underwater superoleophobic modified polysulfone electrospun membrane with efficient antifouling for ultrafast gravitational oil-water separation

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 200, 期 -, 页码 284-293

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.02.043

关键词

Underwater superoleophobic; Oil-water separation; Nanofiber membrane; Modification method; PSf

资金

  1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport [18IFIP-B087389-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A superoleophobic underwater modified electrospun membrane is produced via a novel effective modification method, to overcome the hydrophobicity and fouling propensity of the electrospun polysulfone (PSf) membrane. In which the fabricated PSf electrospun membranes were immersed in different NaOH concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 M) at different temperatures (25, 50, 75, and 100 degrees C) for different time (1, 3, 5, 7 h) to produce 64 modified membranes. Based on the characterization of the modified membranes, the best-modified membrane was chosen and was investigated in the oil-water separation system. More importantly, the best-modified membrane (M64) exhibits underwater superoleophobic feature and it could effectively separate soybean oil and hexane-water mixtures with a superior water flux of 11,865 and 14,016 LMH after the 5th cycle under a gravity-driven process, respectively. Moreover, the membrane possesses remarkable oil-water separation efficiency with more than 99.99% of oil rejection, where soybean oil and hexane content in the filtrate after the 5th cycle were less than 3 and 1 ppm, respectively, which is lower than the acceptable limit of 10 ppm. Also, the modified membrane exhibited antifouling properties with a water flux recovery ratio of 94 and 96.8% after the 5th filtration cycles of soybean oil and hexane-water mixtures. Overall, this study introduces a simple and effective method to overcome the hydrophobicity of the PSf electrospun membrane and enhance the antifouling property.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据