4.7 Article

A low temperature butane gas sensor used Pt nanoparticles-modified AZO macro/mesoporous nanosheets as sensing material

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 254, 期 -, 页码 227-238

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.07.091

关键词

Low-temperature; Butane Gas sensor; Solution combustion synthesis; Pt-AZO; Macro-/mesoporous nanosheets

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology of Yunnan Province via the Key Project for the Science and Technology [2017FA007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51262029]
  3. Science Foundation of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education [GJJ150919]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reported the synthesis and gas-sensing properties of Pt nanoparticles modified Al-doped ZnO (AZO) macro-/mesoporous nanosheets, which were prepared via a solution combustion approach with a subsequent heat treatment at 400 degrees C for 50 min. The high performance in detecting butane were achieved for the well-adhered products with unique porous surface appearance on the sensors fabricated using indirect heating method, which demonstrated the superiority of solution combustion synthesis (SCS) in synthesizing complex oxides. The possible explanations of the high butane gas-sensing characteristics of these sensors were based on the results of BET and XPS. The large surface area could provide sufficient interface between the materials and butane gas, and the adsorbed oxygen species having strong oxidation activity could break the butane molecules into CO2 and H2O. The gas-sensing properties of Pt-modified AZO were investigated by testing the gas responses towards butane. The maximum response of the 5% PtAZO based gas sensor reached 56.52-3000 ppm butane at 200 degrees C. What's more, the sensor also exhibited good short-and long-term stability, repeatability and selectivity, which made it a potential candidate in the application of monitoring butane. In the end, the possible mechanisms of gas-sensing properties were discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据