4.7 Article

Carbon quantum dots-Ag nanoparticle complex as a highly sensitive turn-on fluorescent probe for hydrogen sulfide: A DFT/TD-DFT study of electronic transitions and mechanism of sensing

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 264, 期 -, 页码 404-409

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.02.186

关键词

Carbon quantum dots; Hydrogen sulfide; DFT/TD-DFT; Fluorescence detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [21575090]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [2162009]
  3. Scientific Research Project of Beijing Educational Committee [KM201810028008]
  4. Youth Innovative Research Team of Capital Normal University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an efficient carbon quantum dots (CQDs)-modified silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) (CQDs-AgNPs) as turn-on fluorescence nanoprobe for monitoring hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in brain microdialysate. The fluorescence of the CQDs-AgNPs probe can be selectively and sensitively turned on by H2S due to the formation of Ag-S bonds between AgNPs and H2S and breaking of the Ag-N bond between AgNPs and CQDs. Density functional theory (DFT)/time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) investigation were thoroughly conducted on the electronic structures, absorption and emission spectra of CQDs-AgNPs complex as well as the sensing mechanism for hydrogen sulfide. The CQDs-AgNPs fluorescent probe illustrates a wide linear detection range towards H2S from 1 to 1900 nM with the detection limit of similar to 0.4 nM. This improved sensitivity, lower limit, along with the high selectivity and fast response toward H2S, makes this CQDs-AgNPs complex successfully monitor H2S basal level in rats without exogenous stimulation, which was calculated to be 3.08 +/- 0.10 mu M (n = 3). This novel fluorescence probe provides an assay for direct detection of H2S in the cerebral systems and contributes to understand the physiological function and molecular mechanisms of endogenous H2S. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据