4.7 Article

Pt nanoparticles decorated SnO2 nanoneedles for efficient CO gas sensing applications

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 656-664

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.09.206

关键词

Pt-decorated SnO2; Nanoneedles; Hydrothermal; Gas sensor; Carbon monoxide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51507144, 51277185]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M580771, 2016T90832]
  3. Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (CSTC) [CSTC2016JCYJA0400]
  4. Postdoctoral Science Funded Project of Chongqing [XM2015016]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment & System Security and New Technology [2007DA10512716423]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XDJK2015B004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, we report the synthesis, characterization, and gas sensing applications of Pt nanoparticlesdecorated SnO2 nanoneedles synthesized through a facile hydrothermal process. The synthesized nanoneedles were characterized for their morphological, structural, compositional and sensing properties using different characterization techniques. The morphological and structural characterizations confirmed the synthesis of well crystalline Pt nanoparticles decorated SnO2 nanoneedles with tetragonal rutile crystal phase. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic analysis (XPS) confirmed the spatial distribution of Pt metal into SnO2 nanoneedles. Further, gas sensor applications of the synthesized nanoneedles were studies at different operating temperatures and concentrations of the CO gas. The detailed CO gas sensing analysis revealed that at an optimized temperature of 250 degrees C, the sensor exhibited 23.18 gas response with the response and recovery times of 15 s and 14 s, respectively. The long-term stability and the selectivity of the 3.125 at% Pt-decorated SnO2 nanoneedles were also explored. Finally, a plausible gas sensing mechanism was also proposed. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据