4.7 Article

The development of paper discs immobilized with luciferase/D-luciferin for the detection of ATP from airborne bacteria

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 274-281

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.009

关键词

Immobilization; Luciferase; D-luciferin; Paper disc; Airborne bacteria; ATP

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) Institutional Research Program
  2. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) [2016000160008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of various microbes in the air is one of the main causes of respiratory diseases or ailments affecting the health of humans and livestock. Therefore, early identification and detection of microorganisms in the air are key to preventing the risk associated with microbial infection. In this study, we prepared paper discs (diameter = 0.5 cm) immobilized with luciferase/D-luciferin and found that these discs could be used to determine the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) directly from the heat-lysates of airborne bacteria. The repetition of sequential adsorption/drying of the mixture solution (luciferase and D-luciferin) was performed using paper disc. The storage stability of the paper discs at room temperature was maintained for one month following their preparation while the storage stability of the liquid-based ATP assay not maintained even for one day. The paper discs could detect ATP extracted from aerosolized Escherichia coli (E. coli) as low as 1.17 X 10(3) CFU/mL in pure bacteria samples or 2.32 X 10(3) CFU/mL in bacteria samples containing dust (1 mg/mL). ATP evaluation using the paper discs for detection of aerosolized bacteria may reduce the detection time to be less than 7 min after sampling. Novel paper discs immobilized with luciferase/D-luciferin will be valuable for the development of fast and sensitive sensors for early detection and enumeration of airborne microorganisms without preparation of enzyme solution for ATP assay. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据