4.7 Article

Pore size dependent gas-sensing selectivity based on ZnO@ZIF nanorod arrays

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 258, 期 -, 页码 1099-1106

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.12.024

关键词

MOF; ZIF; ZnO gas sensor; Pore size; Selectivity regulation

资金

  1. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [20130379003]
  2. Analytical Testing Center of HUST
  3. Key Laboratory of Materials and Processing Die & Mould Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently a metal-organic framework (MOF) coating method has been reported for improving the poor gas selectivity of metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) gas sensor. However, the correlation between MOF's pore size and the size of gas molecule is not fully discussed, as well as gas-sensing properties to gases with similar molecular size. In this paper, two zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) with different pore sizes (similar to 3.4 angstrom for ZIF-8, similar to 4.8 angstrom for ZIF-71) are synthesized on the surface of ZnO nanorod arrays to form aZnO@ZIF core-shell structure, where ZIFs act as gas molecule sieve membrane that shields ZnO from gasmolecules larger than the pore size of ZIFs. Hydrogen, ammonia, ethanol, acetone and benzene (molecular size in the range of 2.89-5.85 A) are selected as testing gases. The ZnO@ZIF-8 sensor exhibited a clear response to smaller molecules of hydrogen and ammonia rather than larger molecules of ethanol, acetone and benzene. While the ZnO@ZIF-71 sensor only exhibited inhibited response to benzene, which has the largest molecular size. These results indicate that the selectivity of ZnO gas sensor can be regulated by surface MOF coating with specific pore size. But this pore size depending selectivity regulation method is insufficient effective for targeting gases with similar molecular sizes, which may be improved by further modification on MOF materials for selective adsorption in our future work. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据