4.7 Article

Enhanced photostability and sensing performance of graphene quantum dots encapsulated in electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous filtering membranes

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 902-912

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.02.081

关键词

Graphene quantum dots; Nanofibers; Membranes; Electrospinning; Fluorescence sensor; Chlorine detection

资金

  1. Basque Government under ELKA-RTEK Program (ACTIMAT project) [KK-2015/00094, KK-2016/00097]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a method to encapsulate graphene quantum dots (GQD) in polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibrous membranes to manufacture robust filtering membranes by electrospinning. GQD-PAN membranes with different nanofiber diameter were prepared tuning the electrospinning parameters, all exhibiting the characteristic fluorescence fingerprint of the GQD probes. The photoluminescence (PL) stability of GQD embedded in the PAN fibers was significantly enhanced with respect to that of water dispersed GQD luminescent probes. The PL of GQD-PAN filtering membranes showed remarkable time stability, both stored dry and immersed in phosphate buffer solutions (PBS), as well as exposed to continuous light irradiation. However, the PL intensity of GQD-PAN membranes was irreversibly quenched by highly oxidant free chlorine solutions. Thus, electrospun GQD-PAN membranes exhibited excellent performance as turn-off fluorescence sensing platforms for free chlorine detection in PBS 0.1 M pH 7. The analytical performance of GQD-PAN membranes was comparable to that of GQD solutions with optimal concentrations, displaying a fast (no need of incubation time) and linear response to chlorine concentration in the 10-600 mu M range, a low detection limit of 2 M, high sensitivity, reproducibility and selectivity. Moreover, the sensing performance of the membranes was very stable after being immersed in PBS for months, outperforming the stability of GQD solutions. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据