4.7 Article

Glucose-loaded liposomes for amplified colorimetric immunoassay of streptomycin based on enzyme-induced iron(II) chelation reaction with phenanthroline

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 265, 期 -, 页码 174-181

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.03.049

关键词

Glucose-loaded liposome; Colorimetric immunoassay; Streptomycin residues; Enzymatic catalysis; Iron(II)-phenanthroline colored system

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675029, 21475025]
  2. National Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2014J07001]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT15R11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work designed a signal-on competitive-type colorimetric immunoassay of streptomycin (STR) using glucose-loaded liposome (GLL) and unique iron(II)-phenanthroline [Fe(II)-Phen] system. The assay was executed based on the change in the color and absorbance of Fe(II)-Phen system, followed by enzyme triggered Fe(II) oxidization into Fe(III) in the presence of glucose oxidase (GOx). To construct such an assay, STR-bovine serum albumin (STR-BSA) conjugates were covalently linked with glucose-loaded liposome, whereas anti-STR antibodies were coated onto a microplate. In the presence of STR, a competitive immunoreaction was executed between the analyte and STR-BSA-GLL for the immobilized anti-STR. Upon addition of Triton X-100, the carried liposome was dissociated to release the loaded glucose, which was oxidized by GOx into gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The as-generated H2O2 oxidized iron(II) into iron(III), and decreased the complexation of iron(II) with Phen, thereby resulting in the color change and the decreasing absorbance. Under optimal conditions, the colorimetric immunoassay with the Fe(II)-Phen system exhibited a low detection limit (LOD) of 0.4 pg mL(-1) with a wide dynamic working range from 1.0 pg mL(-1) to 20 ng mL(-1) STR, accompanying good reproducibility and high specificity. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据