4.7 Article

Aconitic acid derived carbon dots: Conjugated interaction for the detection of folic acid and fluorescence targeted imaging of folate receptor overexpressed cancer cells

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 444-451

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.227

关键词

Aconitic acid; Carbon dots; Folic acid; Folate receptor; Cancer cell; Cell imaging

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675069, 21527808, 21405067]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2017-111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, we utilized aconitic acid (AA) as the precursor for preparing carbon dots (AA-CDs) by a facile hydrothermal reaction, and the resulting AA-CDs exhibited bright blue fluorescence with an absolute quantum yield of 56.5% in aqueous solution. Preliminary experiments showed that the prepared AA-CDs without further surface passivation or modification could selectively interact with folic acid (FA), resulting in significant fluorescence quenching. Based on this, a sensitive method for FA analysis was developed with a detection limit of 40 nM (S/N = 3), which was then successfully applied for the detection of FA in food and pharmaceutical samples with the average recoveries of 95.0-105.3%. Furthermore, a weak fluorescent nanoprobe (FA-AA-CDs) was fabricated based on the conjugated interaction of FA and AA-CDs, and its feasibility was evaluated as a fluorescence turn-on nanoprobe for targeted imaging of cancer cells using Hela, SMMC-7721, and A549 cells as models that expressed different levels of folate receptors (FRs) on the cell surface. The results exhibited that the fluorescence intensity of these cells was in accordance with their FRs expression levels, testifying its potential of FA-AA-CDs for targeted imaging of cancer cells. Subsequently, the internalization mechanism of FA-AA-CDs into cells was elucidated via receptor-mediated endocytosis using control experiments. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据