4.7 Article

Design and synthesis of a novel tripod rhodamine derivative for trivalent metal ions detection

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 264, 期 -, 页码 391-397

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.03.003

关键词

Fluorescent probe; Tripod rhodamine derivatives; Synergetic action; EDTA; Logic gate

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation [21601111, 21571116, 21371110]
  2. Youth Science Foundation of Shanxi Province [201601D021054]
  3. Scientific and Technologial Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi [2017108]
  4. Program for the Outstanding Innovative Teams of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi [2017-07]
  5. SanJin Scholars Support Plan [2017-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A tripod rhodamine derivative (L) with flexible chains was synthesized through linking tris(2-aminoethyl) amine appended rhodamine and two thiophene groups. Based on the synergetic action of the acidic medium provided by trivalent metal ions and stability complex came from trivalent metal ions and probe L, the probe displayed higher selectivity and sensitivity in CH3OH/H2O (1/3) solution. The formation of these complexes caused a new absorption peak appearance at 555 nm along with color changes of the solution. Meanwhile, a drive fluorescence behaviors of probe L by the trivalent metal ions were observed with a dramatical enhancement of the fluorescence at 585 nm, respectively. Interestingly, introducing EDTA to the probe L/Fe(III) complex, the fluorescence intensity of the complex was further enhanced. Based on the high throughput analysis strategy, the probe L was designed as a logic gate for detecting trivalent metal ions. Typically, the combination ratio of the probe L with Fe(III) was 1/1 (mole), which was obtained by Job-plot experiment and further confirmed by DFT calculations. Moreover, the tripod rhodamine derivative as a turn-on fluorescence switch was applied to detect Fe(III) in actual sample. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据