4.7 Article

Ultrasensitive detection of miRNA-155 using multi-walled carbon nanotube-gold nanocomposites as a novel fluorescence quenching platform

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 221-227

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.03.071

关键词

MWCNT/AuNCs; DNA probe; Fluorescent sensor; miRNA-155 detection; DSN; Target recycling signal amplification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21305053]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  3. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYZZ16_0468]
  4. Research Innovation Program for College Graduates of Jiangsu Normal University [2017YXJ125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-walled carbon nanotube-gold nanocomposites (MWCNT/AuNCs) were prepared and used as a novel fluorescence quenching platform for ultrasensitive detection of miRNA-155. In the designed system, fluorophore labeled DNA probe was introduced, and the fluorescence signal of them were effectively quenched due to the adsorption of them on MWCNT/AuNCs. Upon the addition of target miRNA-155, DNA-RNA heteroduplexes were formed and desorbed from MWCNT/AuNCs to yield a strong fluorescence signal. In the presence of duplex-specific nuclease (DSN), DNA-RNA heteroduplexes became a substrate for the enzymatic hydrolysis of DNA strands and triggered cyclic signal amplification. Under optimal conditions, MWCNT/AuNCs displayed 93.2% of the quenching efficiency to the fluorophore labeled DNA probe, paving the way for ultrasensitive miRNA-155 detection with a detection limit down to 33.4 fM. Meantime, the present strategy showed excellent selectivity for miRNA-155 detection against other miR-NAs including miRNA-21, miRNA-141, and mutated miRNA-155 strands. Moreover, satisfactory results were obtained for miRNA-155 detection in human serum samples, illustrating that the proposed sensing platform is applicable in disease diagnosis. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据