4.6 Article

Improved Visualization of Hydroacoustic Plumes Using the Split-Beam Aperture Coherence

期刊

SENSORS
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s18072033

关键词

marine gas seeps; gas seep detection; coherence; coherence factor; broadband split beam echo sounder; physical oceanography; scattering layers; hydroacoustic plumes

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway [222327]
  2. NSF [1352301]
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1352301] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural seepage of methane into the oceans is considerable, and plays a role in the global carbon cycle. Estimating the amount of this greenhouse gas entering the water column is important in order to understand their environmental impact. In addition, leakage from man-made structures such as gas pipelines may have environmental and economical consequences and should be promptly detected. Split beam echo sounders (SBES) detect hydroacoustic plumes due to the significant contrast in acoustic impedance between water and free gas. SBES are also powerful tools for plume characterization, with the ability to provide absolute acoustic measurements, estimate bubble trajectories, and capture the frequency dependent response of bubbles. However, under challenging conditions such as deep water and considerable background noise, it can be difficult to detect the presence of gas seepage from the acoustic imagery alone. The spatial coherence of the wavefield measured across the split beam sectors, quantified by the coherence factor (CF), is a computationally simple, easily available quantity which complements the acoustic imagery and may ease the ability to automatically or visually detect bubbles in the water column. We demonstrate the benefits of CF processing using SBES data from the Hudson Canyon, acquired using the Simrad EK80 SBES. We observe that hydroacoustic plumes appear more clearly defined and are easier to detect in the CF imagery than in the acoustic backscatter images.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据