4.3 Review

Acquired and germline predisposition to bone marrow failure: Diagnostic features and clinical implications

期刊

SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 69-82

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2018.05.016

关键词

Bone marrow failure; Aplastic anemia; MDS; GATA2 deficiency; Flow cytometry

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the NIH Clinical Center
  2. National Cancer Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone marrow failure and related syndromes are rare disorders characterized by ineffective bone marrow hematopoiesis and peripheral cytopenias. Although many are associated with characteristic clinical features, recent advances have shown a more complicated picture with a spectrum of broad and overlapping phenotypes and imperfect genotype-phenotype correlations. Distinguishing acquired from inherited forms of marrow failure can be challenging, but is of crucial importance given differences in the risk of disease progression to myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, and other malignancies, as well as the potential to genetically screen relatives and select the appropriate donor if hematopoietic stem cell transplantation becomes necessary. Flow cytometry patterns in combination with morphology, cytogenetics, and history can help differentiate several diagnostic marrow failure and/or insufficiency entities and guide genetic testing. Herein we review several overlapping acquired marrow failure entities including aplastic anemia, hypoplastic myelodysplasia, and large granular lymphocyte disorders; and several bone marrow disorders with germline predisposition, including GATA2 deficiency, CTLA4 haploinsufficiency, dyskeratosis congenita and/or telomeropathies, Fanconi anemia, Shwachman-Diamond syndrome, congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia, severe congenital neutropenia, and Diamond-Blackfan anemia with a focus on advances related to pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据