4.7 Article

The effect of Trichoderma harzianum in mitigating low temperature stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 230, 期 -, 页码 134-141

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.11.028

关键词

Solanum lycopersicum L.; Chilling stress; Trichoderma harzianum; Gene expression; NAC1; TAS14; P5CS

资金

  1. Genetics and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute of Tabarestan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most tomato cultivars are considered as chilling-sensitive plants and the chilling stress prevalent in many regions of the northern hemisphere limits their culture. Some plant-symbiotic strains of the genus Trichoderma colonize plant roots and induce significant changes in plant gene expression leading to enhanced growth, especially under biotic and abiotic stresses. In this study, the effects of Trichoderma harzianurn AK20G strain (Th), as a bio-control agent, was investigated on the tolerance of tomato (Solarium lycopersicum L.) plants under chilling stress. Tomato plants were exposed to low temperatures after being inoculated with Th and their physiological, biochemical and molecular responses were investigated at different time courses. Results showed that Th have efficiently alleviated the adverse effects of cold stress leading to enhanced photosynthetic and growth rates. It was also revealed that Th reduced the lipid peroxidation rate and electrolyte leakage while increasing leaf water content and proline accumulation. Gene expression analysis revealed that the expression of transcription factor NAC1 and dehydrin TAS14 was drastically surged after cold treatment while P5CS expression was decreased with continuation of the cold stress. Interestingly, Th improved the expression of TAS14 and P5CS and their expression increased with the time during the experiment. The findings of the present study provide a detailed insight into the physio-biochemical and molecular processes leading to low temperature tolerance in T. harzianwn-inoculated tomato plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据