4.7 Article

Measuring the distribution of trace elements amongst dissolved colloidal species as a fingerprint for the contribution of tributaries to large boreal rivers

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 642, 期 -, 页码 1242-1251

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.099

关键词

Trace elements; Field-flow fractionation; ICPMS; Colloids; Speciation; Environmental geochemistry

资金

  1. Alberta Innovates [2083]
  2. Canadian Foundation for innovation [28641]
  3. Canadian Oil Sands Innovation Alliance [2083]
  4. Government of Alberta [12023]
  5. University of Alberta Faculty of Agriculture, Life, and Environmental Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic and inorganic colloids play important roles governing the speciation, transport, and bioaccessibility of trace elements in aquatic systems. These carriers are especially important in the boreal zone, where rivers that contain high concentrations of iron and organic matter are prevalent. The distribution of trace elements amongst different colloidal species (or speciation profile) can therefore be useful as a fingerprint to detect different trace element sources and for tracking colloid transformations, with implications for bioaccessibility. Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation coupled to an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer was applied to detect the source of trace elements based on their speciation profile along a 125-km stretch of a large river in the Canadian boreal forest. Both the concentration and proportion of bound trace elements were increased by tributary inputs: bound As, Co, Fe, Mn, Pb, U, and Zn increased monotonically from upstream to downstream, increasingly resembling the speciation profile of tributaries. Principal component (PC) analysis also revealed tributary contributions of bound Cu, Ni, Th, V, and Y reflecting their higher concentrations in tributaries, and PC scores also increased monotonically from upstream-downstream. Monotonically decreasing concentrations of mainly ionic and small ( i.e.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据