4.7 Review

Bioprocessing for elimination antibiotics and hormones from swine wastewater

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 621, 期 -, 页码 1664-1682

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.059

关键词

Swine wastewater; Bioprocesses; Antibiotics; Hormones; Removal efficiency

资金

  1. Joint Research Centre for Protective Infrastructure Technology and Environmental Green Bioprocess (UTS REINGO) [201600220005]
  2. Joint Research Centre for Protective Infrastructure Technology and Environmental Green Bioprocess (Korean Ministy of Environment) [201600220005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotics and hormones in swine wastewater have become a critical concern worldwide due to the severe threats to human health and the eco-environment. Removal of most detectable antibiotics and hormones, such as sulfonamides (SAs), SMs, tetracyclines (TCs), macrolides, and estrogenic hormones from swine wastewater utilizing various biological processes were summarized and compared. In biological processes, biosorption and biodegradation are the two major removal mechanisms for antibiotics and hormones. The residuals in treated effluents and sludge of conventional activated sludge and anaerobic digestion processes can still pose risks to the surrounding environment, and the anaerobic processes' removal efficiencies were inferior to those of aerobic processes. In contrast, membrane bioreactors (MBRs), constructed wetlands (CWs) and modified processes performed better because of their higher biodegradation of toxicants. Process modification on activated sludge, anaerobic digestion and conventional MBRs could also enhance the performance (e.g. removing up to 98% SMs, 88.9% TCs, and 99.6% hormones fromwastewater). The hybrid process combining MBRs with biological or physical technology also led to better removal efficiency. As such, modified conventional biological processes, advanced biological technologies and MBR hybrid systems are considered as a promising technology for removing toxicants from swine wastewater. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据