4.7 Article

Experimental study on the human thermal comfort based on the heart rate variability (HRV) analysis under different environments

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 616, 期 -, 页码 1124-1133

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.208

关键词

Heart rate variability; LF/HF; Thermal comfort; Environments

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51276057, 51676209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to study the human thermal comfort under different environments, the electrocardiogram(ECG) data of 6 subjects were recorded continuously under 60 environments composed by different air temperature, relative humidity and air speed that were created by an environmental chamber. Based on the ECG data, the frequency-domain method was adopted to obtain the heart rate variability (HRV) results. Among the HRV indices, the ratio of the low frequency power and high frequency power of the HRV analysis results (LF/HF), which reflects the balance of the autonomic nervous system, was selected as an indicator of the thermal comfort in the study. And the effects of air temperature, relative humidity and air speed on LF/HF were scrutinized. Meanwhile, a questionnaire survey was conducted during the experiment to evaluate the thermal comfort of the subjects. And the relationships between mean LF/HF and thermal sensation, mean thermal comfort were established based on the survey. The results showed that different LF/HF was observed under different environments, and that the air temperature had the most significant effects on LF/HF. The changes in the air temperature could easily lead to the excitation of the sympathetic nerve that could promote the activities of the thermoregulatory effectors thus thermal discomfort. Additionally, the fitting curves illustrating the relationships between LF/HF and thermal sensation and thermal comfort showed that the higher LF/HF yielded thermal discomfort, while the low LF/HF indicated a thermally acceptable state. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据