4.7 Article

Estimation of bus emissionmodels for different fuel types of buses under real conditions

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 640, 期 -, 页码 965-972

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.289

关键词

Bus emissions; Vehicle specific power; Bus stops; Artificial neural network; Fuel type

资金

  1. Scientific Research Foundation of the Graduate School of Southeast University [YBJJ1633]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Scientific Research Program of the Graduate School of Jiangsu Province [KYLX16-0280]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban buses are heavy vehicles that move frequently throughout the day, and most of them are propelled by heavy-duty diesel engines. For these reasons, they have energy and environmental impacts that should not be ignored. Consequently, the primary objectives of this study were to compare the changes in bus speed, acceleration, and emissions between bus stops, intersections, and road sections by applying statistical methods; and to develop a vehicle specific power (VSP)-based artificial neural network (ANN) model to estimate emissions of CO, HC, NOX, and CO2 for four different fuel types of buses including gas-electric hybrid electric buses (GEHE bus), compressed natural gas buses (CNG bus), EURO 4 heavy-duty diesel engine buses (EURO 4 bus), and EURO 5 heavy-duty diesel engine buses (EURO 5 bus). The results of t-tests (with p-values varying between <0.001 and 0.026, whichwere not >0.050) showed that the differences in emissions between different locations and between different fuel types of buses were all statistically significant. In addition, to evaluate the performance of the proposed method, a polynomial regression model using linear, quadratic, and cubic terms of transient speed and acceleration was utilized for comparison. According to the results, the proposed method had more accurate and reliable estimation, which increased the lower 10% of absolute percentage error (Lower-10% APE) by 65.2%; reduced mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) by 41.4%, root mean squared error (RMSE) by 44.9%, and mean absolute error (MAE) by 43.5%; and increased R-squared from 0.659 to 0.781. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据