4.7 Article

Role of cyclic diguanylate in affecting microbial community shifts at different pH during the operation of simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification process

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 637, 期 -, 页码 155-162

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.015

关键词

Anammox; Suspended sludge; Biofilm; Microbial community; Cyclic diguanylate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21777018]
  2. Metabolomics Facility at Technology Center for Protein Sciences, Tsinghua University
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2013ZX07202-010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intracellular cyclic diguanylate acid (c-di-GMP) has emerged as a prominent second signal molecule that coordinates sessile-motile transition and biofilm formation in many bacteria. Herein, we study the role of c-di-GMP in affecting microbial community shifts at different pH levels during simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification process (SNAD) in integrated fixed film activated sludge (IFAS) reactor. The results demonstrated that the contents of c-di-GMP notably decreased in suspended sludge, whereas the contents of c-di-GMP in biofilm had no significant change as pH gradually increased from 7.5 to 8.5. Most of the bacteria (Blastocatella, Brevundimonas) with flagella that have been reported to be regulated by c-di-GMP were present in suspended sludge, and the microbial community structure of suspended sludge had obvious change than biofilm. The increased alkaline pH reduced intracellular c-di-GMP content for increasing the motility of bacteria to be washed out from the reactor, causing the microbial community shifts in suspended sludge. This change would lead to the increase of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria which would inhibit anammox activity. Overall, this study provided more comprehensive information regarding the shifts of microbial community induced by c-di-GMP in SNAD-IFAS reactor. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据