4.7 Article

Activated carbon thin-layer placement as an in situ mercury remediation tool in a Penobscot River salt marsh

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 621, 期 -, 页码 839-848

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.050

关键词

Methylmercury; Bioavailability; Thin-layer placement; Biochar; SediMite (TM); Estuary

资金

  1. Mallinckrodt U.S. LLC through the United States District Court, District of Maine
  2. Environ Corp

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficacy of thin layer in situ soil amendments was tested as a potential tool for methylmercury (MeHg) risk mitigation in Penobscot River, ME, salt marsh. Salt marshes are sites of high MeHg accumulation within the Penobscot, and key targets for remediation. The study was a fully-crossed small plot study, with four treatments (activated carbon (AC), biochar, FeCl2, and lime) and unamended controls at two sites. Plots were monitored for two years. Porewater MeHg concentrations were the main endpoint, with impacts on sediment biogeochemistry as a secondary study goal. AC-based SediMite (TM) was effective in reducing MeHg, and to a less extent total Hg, in surficial pore waters. AC reduced MeHg concentrations by >90% at the one month time point, and continued to significantly reduce pore water MeHg through about a year. AC was less effective in reducing total Hg in pore water, yielding about 70% reduction at one month, and 50-65% reduction at 8 months. Biochar provided lower, and more variable reduction in porewater MeHg, but was not effective in reducing total Hg. Biochar amendment also increased soil MeHg. Neither FeCl2 nor lime amendments reduced pore water Hg or MeHg levels. About 50% of AC treatment applied as SediMite (TM) pellets was retained in marsh soils after one year. This study is one of the first field trials of in situ amendment for MeHg remediation. Our results show that thin-layer AC placement is a potential remediation tool for Hg risk to biota, especially in marshes where net MeHg accumulation is often strong. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据