4.7 Article

Effects of warming on N2O fluxes in a boreal peatland of Permafrost region, Northeast China

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 616, 期 -, 页码 427-434

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.246

关键词

Warming; N2O flux; Peatlands; Soil temperature; Active layer depth

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0602303]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDJ-SSW-DQC013]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41730643, 41671105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate warming is expected to increasingly influence boreal peatlands and alter their greenhouse gases emissions. However, the effects of warming on N2O fluxes and the N2O budgets were ignored in boreal peatlands. Therefore, in a boreal peatland of permafrost zone in Northeast China, a simulated warming experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of warming on N2O fluxes in Betula. Fruticosa community (B. Fruticosa) and Ledum. palustre community (L. palustre) during the growing seasons from 2013 to 2015. Results showed that warming treatment increased air temperature at 1.5 m aboveground and soil temperature at 5 cm depth by 0.6 degrees C and 2 degrees C, respectively. The average seasonal N2O fluxes ranged from 6.62 to 9.34 mu g m(-2) h(-1) in the warming plot and ranged from 0.41 to 4.55 mu g m(-2) h(-1) in the control plots. Warming treatment increased N2O fluxes by 147% and transformed the boreal peatlands from a N2O sink to a source. The primary driving factors for N2O fluxes were soil temperature and active layer depth, whereas soil moisture showed a weak correlation with N2O fluxes. The results indicated that warming promoted N2O fluxes by increasing soil temperature and active layer depth in a boreal peatland of permafrost zone in Northeast China. Moreover, elevated N2O fluxes persisted in this region will potentially drive a noncarbon feedback to ongoing climate change. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据