4.7 Review

The future of hazardous chemical safety in China: Opportunities, problems, challenges and tasks

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 643, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.174

关键词

Hazardous chemical safety; Hazardous chemical accidents; China; Problems; Challenges; Future thinking

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51534008, 51704328]
  2. Graduate Student Research Innovation Project of Hunan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

China is a major country producing and using hazardous chemicals. Unfortunately, the hazardous chemical industry is still one of the most high-risk industries in China. In recent years, especially after two devastating hazardous chemical accidents, namely Qingdao 11.2 Crude Oil Leaking and Explosion Accident and Tianjin Port 8.12 Fire and Explosion Accident which occurred in 2013 and 2015 respectively, China has attached great importance to hazardous chemical safety. The period between 2016 and 2017 is a crucial period for the future direction of hazardous chemical safety in China because China released a series of important government documents (such as 'Thirteenth Five-Year (2016-2020) Plan for Hazardous Chemical Safety' and 'Comprehensive Plan for Hazardous Chemical Safety Management (December 2016-November 2019)') to promote hazardous chemical safety in the future. What is the future development of China's hazardous chemical safety? To answer this question, this paper attempts to briefly analyze and introduce the opportunities, problems, challenges and tasks of the future of safety with hazardous chemical industrial activities in China, according to the current situation of hazardous chemical safety in China and using the latest government documents and studies. Obviously, this study can provide useful evidence and suggestions for the future of safety management in the hazardous chemical industry both within China and in other countries. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据