4.7 Article

Presence of pharmaceuticals in fish collected from urban rivers in the US EPA 2008-2009 National Rivers and Streams Assessment

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 634, 期 -, 页码 542-549

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.387

关键词

Pharmaceuticals; Fish; Accumulation; Trophic level

资金

  1. European Union through the European Regional Development Fund
  2. Economy and Knowledge Department of the Catalan Government [2014 SGR 291-ICRA]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [RYC-2014-16707]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fish are good indicators of aquatic environment pollution because of their capability to uptake pollutants contained in water. Therefore, accumulation of pharmaceutical compounds in freshwater and marine fish and other aquatic organisms has been studied extensively in the last decade. In this context, the present study investigates the occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in wild fish from 25 polluted river sites in the USA, downstream from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Sample sites constitute a subset of urban rivers investigated in the U.S. EPA's 2008-2009 National Rivers and Streams Assessment. Thirteen pharmaceuticals (out of the twenty compounds analyzed) were quantified in fish fillets at concentrations commonly below 10 ng g(-1), in accordance with the findings from previous studies in the USA and Europe. The psychoactive drugs venlafaxine, carbamazepine and its metabolite 2-hydroxy carbamazepine were the most prevalent compounds (58%, 27% and 42%, respectively). This group of drugs is highly prescribed and rather resistant to degradation during conventional treatment in WWTPs as well as in natural aquatic environments. Salbutamol, a drug used to treat asthma, and the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide were also frequently detected (in > 20% of the samples). Occurrence of six pharmaceutical families due to chronic exposure at environmental concentrations in water was detected in eight fish species. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据