4.7 Article

Bioaccumulation and tissue distribution of antibiotics in wild marine fish from Laizhou Bay, North China

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 631-632, 期 -, 页码 1398-1405

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.139

关键词

Antibiotics; Bioaccumulation; Tissue distribution; Marine fish; Laizhou Bay

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB430403]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21325729, 21677023]
  3. Basic Research Project of Key Laboratory of Liaoning Provincial Education Department [LZ2015023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Information about bioaccumulation and tissue distribution of antibiotics in wild marine fish is still limited. In the present study, tissue levels, bioaccumulation and distribution patterns of 9 sulfonamide (SA), trimethoprim (TMP), 5 fluoroquinolone (FQ), and 4 macrolide (ML) antibiotics were investigated in gill, muscle, kidney, and liver tissues of seven wild fish species collected from Laizhou Bay, North China in 2016. All the 19 antibiotics were detected in these fish tissues with the total concentrations ranging from 22 ng/g dry weight (dw) to 500 ng/g dw. The mean values of logarithm bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) in the gills, muscles, kidneys, and livers ranged from 2.2 to 4.8, 1.9 to 4.0, 2.5 to 4.9, and 2.5 to 5.4, respectively. Log BAPS of antibiotics in these tissues significantly increased (r = 0.61-0.77, p < 0.001) with their logarithm values of liposome-water distribution coefficient (D-lipw) except in the muscles, suggesting that D-lipw can well assess the bioaccumulation potentials of antibiotics in phospholipid-rich tissues. In general, the SAs. TMP, and FQs were primarily accumulated in the muscles and the MLs were primarily in the livers, which may be related to their toxicokinetic processes of these marine fish. The present study for the first time reported the tissue distribution patterns of antibiotics in wild marine fish. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据