4.7 Article

Occurrence of pesticide residues in fish from south American rainfed agroecosystems

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 631-632, 期 -, 页码 169-179

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.320

关键词

Rainfed agriculture; Pesticide residues; Fish; RAMSAR site; Biomonitoring; Mass spectrometry

资金

  1. INIA (Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria) [FPTA 324]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental sustainability of South American rainfed agroecosystems is of current concern. In this work, we evaluate the occurrence of multiple pesticide residues in muscle tissue of wild fish species from two large rivers in South America (Uruguay and Negro Rivers). Two sampling campaigns (representing summer and winter crops) were performed during 2015 targeting a wide biodiversity of fish species used for human consumption (ranging from migratory to non-migratory and from detritivorous to top-predators). Three different localities associated to rainfed agriculture were assessed, two of them enclosed to a RAMSAR site (National Park Esteros de Farrapos e Islas del Rio Uruguay). Pesticide residues occurred in muscle tissue of 143 from 149 sampled fishes (96%). Thirty different pesticides were detected at concentrations from <1 to 194 mu g kg(-1). Incidence of pesticides in fish were tightly related to: i) features of the contaminant: (Kow, environmental persistence and mobility) and ii) intensity of use of particular pesticides and land dedicated to rainfed agriculture. Trilloxystrobin, metolachlor and pyradostrobin showed the highest rates of occurrence. Of great concern is that strobirulins have highest toxicity to fish from those detected compounds. From the pattern of pesticides occurring for non-migratory fish species it was possible to trend important spatial differences related to the intensity of rainfed agriculture. Results suggest a regular exposition of aquatic wild biota to sublethal concentrations of multiple semi-polar pesticides. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据